by Zancarius » Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:25 am
Wow... that was certainly an interesting read. I'm not even sure where to start!
I think the author is most certainly right that smaller user communities (like OS X) tend to have sites better suited for human interaction and less inclined to be ranked with AdWords/AdSense. To an extend, I think this holds true for the F/OSS community with the exception that, since everything is submitted with the full-source viewable, it's a little bit more difficult to avoid scrutiny. After all, the F/OSS model depends on the end users being able to submit bug fixes! (Although, not all open source projects are willing to accept bug reports, and of the few fixes I have bothered to submit to some PHP-based projects, every single one was rejected on the grounds that the fix "wasn't necessary" because the bug only occurred under very unlikely conditions.)
Shareware, on the other hand, is one of those things that sort of floats halfway between legitimacy and illegality. It most certainly never used to be that way, either. I think that as malware has become more prolific, the inherent trust of software has been in steady decline. If there's something I want to try, I'm reluctant to do so (under Windows, anyway) unless I can find numerous sources recommending that particular piece of software or stating that it does what it says and is clean! Then again, as F/OSS has infiltrated the world of Windows, this is becoming less of a problem, since many popular software packages are available on that platform (Pidgin, formerly Gaim; Audacity, a free audio editor; and Gimp, just to name a few).
But hey, it's a "download at your own risk" world these days. I think your article is further proof that we should all exercise caution! Thanks, Tirian!
I gave that lich a phylactery shard. Liches love phylactery shards.